Conrad Black's return to Canada a couple of weeks ago exploded most unexpectedly onto our news pages when the Leader of the Opposition referred to him as a "British criminal" in our House of Commons in the context of a question wondering whether he would be permitted to return to Canada upon his release. Canada does not - as a rule, though there have been exceptions - admit convicted people to the country.
Now, while the description was rather unexpected and controversial, it was not wholly without reason. Black was forced to renounce his Canadian citizenship in order to assume a peerage in the House of Lords in the UK, and he was convicted in a US court. However, renunciation or not, Black is Canadian born and will forever be identified as Canadian in most minds. His wife lives here. He has property here. Its hard to deny that his home is here. As for his conviction, while he believes that he was wrongfully convicted, to his credit he has served his time. And, even more to his credit, he is forthright in denouncing the US justice system and in denouncing the use of imprisonment for non-violent crimes. He is openly critical of our current government for their misguided "justice" policies and legislation. From an interview with the CBC's Peter Mansbridge on Monday:
The idea of prison for non-violent people is nonsense. Its done because its always been done, but it is nonsense, it is not the way to treat people. It’s horribly expensive. It’s tokenistic, fetishistic, and a matrix for the magnification of abuse and the exacerbation of sociopathic problems. It is an absolutely catastrophic misjudgment in how to deal with non-violent crime. I’m not talking about people who are a physical menace to society, that’s a different matter.
It is easy to have mixed feelings about the man. But no one can deny that he is a gifted writer and intellectual. I bought and read his biography of Roosevelt - in paperback, naturally, for I saw no need to contribute unnecessarily to his wealth. I will not buy his biography of Nixon, though; that's asking too much of my leftish sympathies. His erudition was on display in another part of his interview with Peter Mansbridge, one that left Mansbridge looking rather ill educated:
[Mansbridge] You’ll be signing up to twitter soon…
...
[Mansbridge] I thought you’d be against twitter because there’s no way Conrad Black could say what he wanted to say in 140 characters
[Black] No, I can manage that, and I think they’ve done a good job in destabilizing totalitarian despotic regimes but just the idea of twitter bugs me
[Mansbridge] Some of the words you use are more than 140 characters let alone the sentences
[Black] That was a brobdinagian insult!
[Mansbridge] Really. I’ll look that up.
Black then sotto voce suggested to Mansbridge that this was from Swift.
I wasn't convinced watching him that Mansbridge knew that Black was referring to Gulliver's Travels.
The interview clip is here. Whatever you think of the man or his opinions, I think it is a joy to listen to him.